The actual thing, without editorializing

In order to maintain availability going forward, I have created [https://fedia.io/m/OriginalDocuments](https://fedia.io/m/OriginalDocuments) kbin.social has been experiencing regular outages and an increase in spam accounts. While I hope that kbin succeeds in the long term, I feel that this is the correct decision right now.

Excerpt: > > > To protect the integrity of this criminal proceeding and avoid prejudice to the jury, the People respectfully request that this Court issue a narrowly tailored order restricting certain prejudicial extrajudicial statements by defendant. The legal authority for such an order is wellestablished. And the need for such protection is compelling. Defendant has a long history of making public and inflammatory remarks about the participants in various judicial proceedings against him, including jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and court staff. Those remarks, as well as the inevitable reactions they incite from defendant’s followers and allies, pose a significant and imminent threat to the orderly administration of this criminal proceeding and a substantial likelihood of causing material prejudice. For these reasons, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently upheld restrictions on defendant’s extrajudicial speech that are essentially identical to the ones requested by the People here. This Court should accordingly grant the narrowly tailored protective measures sought here. > >

Algeria's UN draft resolution calling for immediate ceasefire in Palestine was vetoed by United States during UN Security Council's 9552nd meeting on 20 February 2024. 20 February 2024 UN [press release](https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15595.doc.htm): Security Council Again Fails to Adopt Resolution Demanding Immediate Humanitarian Ceasefire in Gaza on Account of Veto by United States UN Security Council veto records: [https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/veto](https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/veto) UN Security Council 2024 meeting records: [https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/2024](https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/2024) Full draft resolution: > > > United Nations Security Council > Distr: General > 20 February 2024 > Original: English > > > > **Algeria: draft resolution** > > > > *The Security Council*, > > > > *Reaffirming* the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, > > > > *Recalling* all its relevant resolutions on the situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question, > > > > *Recalling* also the Order delivered on 26 January 2024 by the International Court of Justice indicating provisional measures to Israel in the case concerning the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (South Africa v. Israel) in relation to the right of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip to be protected from all acts within the scope of Article II and Article III of the Convention, > > > > *Recalling* further the letter dated 6 December 2023 of the Secretary-General, under Article 99 of the Charter of the United Nations, ad dressed to the President of the Security Council (S/2023/962), > > > > *Reiterating* its demand that all parties to the conflict comply with their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law, in particular with regard to the conduct of hostilities and the protection of civilians and civilian objects, and recalling the obligation to respect and protect humanitarian relief and medical personnel as well as medical infrastructure, medical transports and the wounded and sick, and to refrain from depriving the Palestinian civilian population in the Gaza Strip of essential goods and services indispensable to their survival and humanitarian assistance, consistent with international humanitarian law and international human rights law, > > > > *Reaffirming* the obligations of all parties regarding the provision of humanitarian assistance, and its demand that they allow, facilitate and enable the immediate, full, safe and unhindered delivery of humanitarian assistance at scale directly to the Palestinian civilian population throughout the Gaza Strip, > > > > *Welcoming* the appointment of Ms. Sigrid Kaag, as Senior Humanitarian and Reconstruction Coordinator for Gaza pursuant to its resolution 2720, underscoring the need to provide her team with the resources and support necessary to fulfil her mandate, and emphasizing the urgent need to expand the flow of humanitarian assistance to civilians in the Gaza Strip, > > > > *Reaffirming* its strong concern for the disproportionate and grave effect that the conflict is having on the civilian population, with particular impact on the lives and well-being of children, women, and persons with disabilities as well as other civilians in vulnerable situations, > > > > *Expressing* grave concern over the dire and urgently deteriorating humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip and the adverse conditions of life for and suffering of the Palestinian civilian population, > > > > *Expressing* also grave concern over the impact of the situation in Gaza on regional and international peace and security, > > > > *Emphasizing* the imperative of accountability for all violations of international law, > > > > *Stressing* that the Gaza Strip constitutes an integral part of the territory occupied in 1967, and reiterating the vision of the two-state solution, with the Gaza Strip as part of the Palestinian State, > > > > 1. *Demands* an immediate humanitarian ceasefire that must be respected by all parties; > 2. *Reiterates* its demand that all parties scrupulously comply with their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law, in particular including with regard to the protection of civilians and civilian objects, and in this regard deplores all attacks against civilians and civilian objects, as well as all violence and hostilities against civilians, and all acts of terrorism; > 3. *Rejects* forced displacement of the Palestinian civilian population, including women and children, in violation of international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law, and demands an immediate end to any such violations; > 4. *Demands* the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages, as well as ensuring humanitarian access to address medical needs of all hostages, and further demands that the parties comply with their obligations under international law in relation to all persons they detain and respect their human rights; > 5. *Reiterates* its call for the full, rapid, safe, and unhindered humanitarian access into and throughout the entire Gaza Strip and for the urgent, continuous and sufficient provision of humanitarian assistance at scale to the Palestinian civilian population, including by facilitating the use of all available routes to and throughout the entire Gaza Strip, including border crossings, in accordance with international humanitarian law and its relevant resolutions; > 6. *Demands* the implementation of its resolutions 2712 (2023) and 2720 (2023) in full; > 7. *Reiterates* its unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-State solution where two democratic States, Israel and Palestine, live side by side in peace within secure and recognized borders, consistent with international law and relevant UN resolutions, and in this regard stresses the importance of unifying the Gaza Strip with the West Bank under the Palestinian Authority; > 8. *Emphasizes* the importance of preventing further escalation in the region, and, in this regard, calls on all parties to exercise maximum restraint and calls on all those with influence on the parties to work toward this objective; > 9. *Decides* to remain actively seized of the matter. > >

Live Stream of the Proceedings of Wednesday, 21st February, 2024 (10th Sitting of the 1st Meeting of the 4th Session of the 8th Parliament), discussing the "Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill, 2021." Bill PDF: [https://ir.parliament.gh/bitstream/handle/123456789/3045/Promotion%20of%20Proper%20Human%20Sexual%20rights%20and%20Ghanaian%20Family%20Values%20Bill%2c%202021.pdf](https://ir.parliament.gh/bitstream/handle/123456789/3045/Promotion%20of%20Proper%20Human%20Sexual%20rights%20and%20Ghanaian%20Family%20Values%20Bill%2c%202021.pdf) Excerpt: > > > LGBTTQQIAAP+ and Related Activities > **Prohibition of LGBTTQQIAAP+ and related activities** > 6. (1) A person commits an offence if the person > (a) engages in a > (i) sexual intercourse between or among persons of the same sex; > (ii) sexual intercourse between a man and an animal or a woman and an animal; or > (iii) pansexual activity; > (b) marries or purports to marry a person who is of the same sex as that person; > (c) knowingly marries or purports to marry a person who has undergone gender or sex reassignment, except in the case of a person who has undergone a surgical procedure to correct a biological anomaly, including intersex; > (d) marries or purports to marry an animal; > (e) holds out as > (i) a lesbian, > (ii) a gay, > (iii) a transgender, > (iv) a transsexual, > (v) a queer, > (vi) a pansexual, > (vil) an ally, > (viii) a non-binary, or > (ix) any other sexual or gender identity that is contrary to the binary categories of male and female; > (f) provides or participates in the provision of > (i) asurgical procedure for sex or gender reassignment; or > (ii) any other procedure that is intended to create a sexual category other than the sexual category of a person assigned at birth except in the case of correcting a biological abnormality including intersex; or > (g) undergoes: > (i) a surgical procedure for sex or gender reassignment; or > (ii) any other procedure that is intended to create a sexual category other than the sexual category of the person assigned at birth except in the case of correcting a biological abnormality including intersex. > (2) A person who commits an offence under paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), or (g) of subsection (1) commits a second degree felony and is liable on summary conviction to a fine of not less than seven hundred and fifty penalty units and not more than five thousand penalty units or to a term of imprisonment of not less than three years and not more than five years or both. > (3) For purposes of this section, “sexual intercourse” occurs where > (a) a person penetrates the anus or mouth of another person with the penis of that person or other contraption; or > (b) a person, by use of any object or contraption, penetrates or stimulates the vagina or anus of another person; or > (c) a person, by use of the penis of the person or any other object or contraption, penetrates the anus or other bodily opening of an animal > for sexual gratification. > > Appendix A PDF: [https://ir.parliament.gh/bitstream/handle/123456789/3045/Appendix%20A%20Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20the%20promotion%20of%20proper%20human%20Sexual%20Rights%20and%20Ghanaian%20Family%20Values%20Bill%2c%202021.pdf](https://ir.parliament.gh/bitstream/handle/123456789/3045/Appendix%20A%20Proposed%20Amendments%20to%20the%20promotion%20of%20proper%20human%20Sexual%20Rights%20and%20Ghanaian%20Family%20Values%20Bill%2c%202021.pdf) Bill record link: [https://ir.parliament.gh/handle/123456789/3045?show=full](https://ir.parliament.gh/handle/123456789/3045?show=full)

Court docket: [https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63148084/sony-music-entertainment-v-cox-communications-incorporated/](https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63148084/sony-music-entertainment-v-cox-communications-incorporated/) Excerpts: > > > RUSHING, Circuit Judge: > > > > Defendant Cox Communications sells internet, telephone, and cable television service to 6 million homes and businesses across the United States. Plaintiffs—Sony Music Entertainment and numerous other record companies and music publishers—own some of the most popular copyrighted musical works of our time. Some users of Cox’s internet service infringed Plaintiffs’ copyrights by downloading or distributing songs over the internet without permission. Rather than sue those individuals, Plaintiffs sued Cox, seeking to hold it responsible for its customers’ copyright infringement. > > > > Federal law protects internet service providers from monetary liability for copyright infringement committed by users of their networks, but only if those service providers reasonably implement a policy to terminate repeat infringers in appropriate circumstances. In a prior case, our Court held that Cox had failed to reasonably implement an anti-piracy program and therefore did not qualify for the statutory safe harbor. > > > > This case proceeded to trial on two theories of secondary liability: vicarious and contributory copyright infringement. The jury found Cox liable for both willful contributory and vicarious infringement of 10,017 copyrighted works owned by Plaintiffs and awarded $1 billion in statutory damages. Cox appealed. > > > > We affirm the jury’s finding of willful contributory infringement. But we reverse the vicarious liability verdict and remand for a new trial on damages because Cox did not profit from its subscribers’ acts of infringement, a legal prerequisite for vicarious liability. > > > > > the crux of the financial benefit inquiry is whether a causal relationship exists between the infringing activity and a financial benefit to the defendant. If copyright infringement draws customers to the defendant’s service or incentivizes them to pay more for their service, that financial benefit may be profit from infringement. See, e.g., EMI Christian Music Grp., Inc. v. MP3tunes, LLC, 844 F.3d 79, 99 (2d Cir. 2016). But in every case, the financial benefit to the defendant must flow directly from the third party’s acts of infringement to establish vicarious liability. See Grokster, 545 U.S. at 930 & n.9; Nelson-Salabes, 284 F.3d at 513. > > > > To prove vicarious liability, therefore, Sony had to show that Cox profited from its subscribers’ infringing download and distribution of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted songs. It did not. > > > > The district court thought it was enough that Cox repeatedly declined to terminate infringing subscribers’ internet service in order to continue collecting their monthly fees. Evidence showed that, when deciding whether to terminate a subscriber for repeat infringement, Cox considered the subscriber’s monthly payments. See, e.g., J.A. 1499 (“This customer will likely fail again, but let’s give him one more chan[c]e. [H]e pays 317.63 a month.”). To the district court, this demonstrated the requisite connection between the customers’ continued infringement and Cox’s financial gain. > > > > We disagree. The continued payment of monthly fees for internet service, even by repeat infringers, was not a financial benefit flowing directly from the copyright infringement itself. As Cox points out, subscribers paid a flat monthly fee for their internet access no matter what they did online. Indeed, Cox would receive the same monthly fees even if all of its subscribers stopped infringing. Cox’s financial interest in retaining subscriptions to its internet service did not give it a financial interest in its subscribers’ myriad online activities, whether acts of copyright infringement or any other unlawful acts. An internet service provider would necessarily lose money if it canceled subscriptions, but that demonstrates only that the service provider profits directly from the sale of internet access. Vicarious liability, on the other hand, demands proof that the defendant profits directly from the acts of infringement for which it is being held accountable. > > > > Sony responds that, even if we disagree with the district court, the jury heard other evidence of Cox’s direct financial interest in its subscribers’ copyright infringement. But none of Sony’s alternative theories supports vicarious liability here. > >

Summary: > > > Reported to Senate (12/13/2023) > > > > Kids Online Safety Act > > > > This bill sets out requirements to protect minors from online harms. > > > > The requirements apply to covered platforms, which are applications or services (e.g., social networks) that connect to the internet and are likely to be used by minors. However, the bill exempts internet service providers, email services, educational institutions, and other specified entities from the requirements. > > > > Covered platforms must take reasonable measures in the design and operation of products or services used by minors to prevent and mitigate certain harms that may arise from that use (e.g., sexual exploitation and online bullying). > > > > Additionally, covered platforms must provide (1) minors with certain safeguards, such as settings that restrict access to minors' personal data; and (2) parents or guardians with tools to supervise minors' use of a platform, such as control of privacy and account settings. > > > > Covered platforms must also > > > > * disclose specified information, including details regarding the use of personalized recommendation systems and individual-specific advertising to minors; > * allow parents, guardians, minors, and schools to report certain harms; > * refrain from facilitating advertising of age-restricted products or services (e.g., tobacco and gambling) to minors; and > * annually report on foreseeable risks of harm to minors from using the platform. > > > > Additionally, the bill requires large (based on specified revenue, employment, or user criteria) websites, internet applications, and search engines (including social network sites) to meet certain requirements before using algorithms that prioritize information furnished to the user based on user-specific data. For example, such platforms must (1) provide users with notice that the website uses such algorithms, and (2) make available a version of the platform that uses algorithms that do not prioritize information based on user data. > > > > The bill provides for enforcement through the Federal Trade Commission and states. > > > > Further, the bill requires the commission to seek to contract with the National Academy of Sciences to study the risks of harm to minors by the use of social media and other online platforms. > > > > The bill establishes a council to advise on implementing the bill. It also requires guidance for market and product research focused on minors and an evaluation of options to verify a user's age. > >

Bill status tracking link: [https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill\_Status/Bills\_history.cfm?input=4654&year=2024&sessiontype=RS&btype=bill](https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/Bills_history.cfm?input=4654&year=2024&sessiontype=RS&btype=bill) > > > A BILL to amend and reenact §61-8A-3 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to removing bona fide schools, public libraries, and museums from the list of exemptions from criminal liability relating to distribution and display to minor of obscene matter. > > > > Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia: > ARTICLE 8A. PREPARATION, DISTRIBUTION OR EXHIBITION OF OBSCENE MATTER TO MINORS. > §61-8A-3. Exemptions from criminal liability. > > > > The criminal provisions of §61-8A-2 of this code do not apply to: > > > > ~~(a) A bona fide school, in the presentation of local or state approved curriculum;~~ > > > > ~~(b) A public library, or museum, which is displaying or distributing any obscene matter to a minor only when the minor was accompanied by his or her parent~~ > > > > ~~(c)~~ (a) A licensed medical or mental health care provider, or judicial or law-enforcement officer, during the course of medical, psychiatric, or psychological treatment or judicial or law-enforcement activities; > > > > ~~(d)~~ (b) A person who did not know or have reason to know, and could not reasonably have learned, that the person to whom the obscene matter was distributed or displayed was a minor and who took reasonable measures to ascertain the identity and age of the minor; > > > > ~~(e)~~ (c) A person who routinely distributes obscene matter by the use of telephone, computer network or the Internet and who distributes such matter to any minor under the age of eighteen years after the person has taken reasonable measures to prevent access by minors to the obscene matter; or > > > > ~~(f)~~ (d) A radio or television station, cable television service or other telecommunications service regulated by the federal communications commission. > > > > NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to remove schools, museums, and public libraries from the exemption which protects these types of entities from prosecution for distribution and display to minor of an obscene matter. > > > > Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added. > >

Excerpt: > > > This Court has long held that unborn children are "children" for purposes of Alabama's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act, § 6-5-391, Ala. Code 1975, a statute that allows parents of a deceased child to recover punitive damages for their child's death. The central question presented in these consolidated appeals, which involve the death of embryos kept in a cryogenic nursery, is whether the Act contains an unwritten exception to that rule for extrauterine children -- that is, unborn children who are located outside of a biological uterus at the time they are killed. Under existing black-letter law, the answer to that question is no: the Wrongful Death of a Minor Act applies to all unborn children, regardless of their location. > >

Summary: > > > Donald Trump and entities he controls own many valuable properties, including office buildings, hotels, and golf courses. Acquiring and developing such properties required huge amounts of cash. Accordingly, the entities borrowed from banks and other lenders. The lenders required personal guarantees from Donald Trump, which were based on statements of financial condition compiled by accountants that Donald Trump engaged. The accountants created these “compilations” based on data submitted by the Trump entities. In order to borrow more and at lower rates, defendants submitted blatantly false financial data to the accountants, resulting in fraudulent financial statements. When confronted at trial with the statements, defendants’ fact and expert witnesses simply denied reality, and defendants failed to accept responsibility or to impose internal controls to prevent future recurrences. As detailed herein, this Court now finds defendants liable, continues the appointment of an Independent Monitor, orders the installation of an Independent Director of Compliance, and limits defendants’ right to conduct business in New York for a few years. > >

Jack Smith's response to SCOTUS regarding Trump's request for a continued stay of the DC election interferece case pending appeal on the question of presidential immunity.

[Ficha | Court case files](https://buscador.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/buscador-externo/principal/fichaSentencia?numero=67-23-IN%2F24). > > > **Resumen:** La Corte Constitucional resuelve la acción pública de inconstitucionalidad propuesta en contra del artículo 144 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, que tipifica el homicidio simple. Al respecto, este Organismo declara la **constitucionalidad condicionada** del referido artículo y aclara que **será constitucional** siempre y cuando **no sea sancionado (i)** el médico que ejecute la conducta tipificada en el artículo 144 del COIP en el supuesto en el que **(ii)** una persona, expresando su consentimiento inequívoco, libre e informado (o a través de su representante cuando no pueda expresarlo), solicite acceder a un procedimiento de eutanasia activa **(iii)** por el padecimiento de sufrimiento intenso proveniente de una lesión necesariamente de carácter corporal, grave e irreversible o una enfermedad que sea grave e incurable. > > > > La Corte considera que el supuesto planteado se relaciona con los derechos a la vida digna y al libre desarrollo de la personalidad (autonomía), por lo que, tras efectuar un examen concluye que la vida admite excepciones a su inviolabilidad cuando busca proteger otros derechos. > > > > En el presente caso, se verifica que el supuesto examinado es incompatible con el derecho previsto en el artículo 66, número 2 -vida digna- de la CRE, pues este tiene dos dimensiones: la primera, entendida como subsistencia y, la segunda, como el conjunto de condiciones mínimas que permitan una vida decorosa, es decir, que concurran factores que permitan el alcance de los ideales de excelencia humana de cada persona. De igual forma, la Corte evidencia que el artículo impugnado en el supuesto abordado es contrario al derecho al libre desarrollo de la personalidad, contenido en el artículo 66 número 5 de la CRE, mismo que protege de manera general la capacidad de las personas para autodeterminarse, para configurar su propio proyecto de vida conforme a sus valores, creencias, su visión del mundo y las circunstancias que le rodean sin más limitaciones que los derechos de los demás. > >

[Link to PDF of official press release in English](https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240208-pre-01-00-en.pdf). [Link to PDF of official press release in French](https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240208-pre-01-00-fr.pdf). INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website X YouTube LinkedIn Press Release Unofficial No. 2024/14 8 February 2024 Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) Nicaragua requests permission to intervene in the proceedings under Article 62 of the Statute THE HAGUE, 8 February 2024. On 23 January 2024, Nicaragua, referring to Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, filed in the Registry of the Court an Application for permission to intervene “as a party” in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel). Pursuant to Article 62 of the Statute, whenever a State not party to a case considers that it has an interest of a legal nature which may be affected by the decision in the case, it may submit a request to the Court to be permitted to intervene. In its Application for permission to intervene, Nicaragua states that it “has interests of a legal nature that stem from the rights and obligations imposed by the Genocide Convention on all State Parties” and flow from “the universal character both of the condemnation of genocide and of the cooperation required ‘in order to liberate mankind from such an odious scourge’”. Nicaragua considers that the conduct of Israel is in “violation of its obligations under the Genocide Convention, including Articles I, III, IV, V and VI, read in conjunction with Article II”. Therefore, Nicaragua requests the Court to adjudge and declare: “(1) that the Republic of South Africa and the State of Israel each have a duty to act in accordance with their obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, in relation to the members of the Palestinian group, to take all reasonable measures within their power to prevent genocide; and (2) that the State of Israel: (a) has breached and continues to breach its obligations under the Genocide Convention, in particular the obligations provided under Article I, read in conjunction with Article II, and Articles III (a), III (b), III (c), III (d), III (e), IV, V and VI; (b) must cease forthwith any acts and measures in breach of those obligations, including such acts or measures which would be capable of killing or continuing to kill * 2 - Palestinians, or causing or continuing to cause serious bodily or mental harm to Palestinians or deliberately inflicting on their group, or continuing to inflict on their group, conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, and fully respect its obligations under the Genocide Convention, in particular the obligations provided under Articles I, III (a), III (b), III (c), III (d), III (e), IV, V and VI; (c) must ensure that persons committing genocide, conspiring to commit genocide, directly and publicly inciting genocide, attempting to commit genocide and complicit in genocide contrary to Articles I, III (a), III (b), III (c), III (d) and III (e) are punished by a competent national or international tribunal, as required by Articles I, IV, V and VI; (d) to that end and in furtherance of those obligations arising under Articles I, IV, V and VI, must collect and conserve evidence and ensure, allow and/or not inhibit directly or indirectly the collection and conservation of evidence of genocidal acts committed against Palestinians in Gaza, including such members of the group displaced from Gaza; (e) must perform the obligations of reparation in the interest of Palestinian victims, including but not limited to allowing the safe and dignified return of forcibly displaced and/or abducted Palestinians to their homes, respect for their full human rights and protection against further discrimination, persecution, and other related acts, and provide for the reconstruction of what it has destroyed in Gaza, consistent with the obligation to prevent genocide under Article I; and (f) must offer assurances and guarantees of non-repetition of violations of the Genocide Convention, in particular the obligations provided under Articles I, III (a), III (b), III (c), III (d), III (e), IV, V and VI.” As the basis of jurisdiction between Nicaragua and the Parties to the present proceedings, Nicaragua invokes Article IX of the Genocide Convention. In accordance with Article 83 of the Rules of Court, South Africa and Israel have been invited to furnish written observations on Nicaragua’s Application for permission to intervene. The full text of Nicaragua’s Application for permission to intervene will be available on the Court’s website shortly. --- History of the proceedings On 29 December 2023, South Africa filed an Application instituting proceedings against Israel concerning alleged violations by Israel of its obligations under the Genocide Convention in relation to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The Application also contained a request for the indication of provisional measures, pursuant to Article 41 of the Statute of the Court and Articles 73, 74 and 75 of the Rules of Court. The Applicant requested the Court to indicate provisional measures in order to “protect against further, severe and irreparable harm to the rights of the Palestinian people under the Genocide Convention” * 3 - and “to ensure Israel’s compliance with its obligations under the Genocide Convention not to engage in genocide, and to prevent and to punish genocide”. Public hearings on the request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by South Africa were held on Thursday 11 and Friday 12 January. On 26 January 2024, the Court delivered its Order on South Africa’s request. Earlier press releases relating to this case are available on the Court’s website. --- Note: The Court’s press releases are prepared by its Registry for information purposes only and do not constitute official documents. --- The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It was established by the United Nations Charter in June 1945 and began its activities in April 1946. The Court is composed of 15 judges elected for a nine-year term by the General Assembly and the Security Council of the United Nations. The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands). The Court has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by States; and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and agencies of the system. --- Information Department: Ms Monique Legerman, First Secretary of the Court, Head of Department: +31 (0)70 302 2336 Ms Joanne Moore, Information Officer: +31 (0)70 302 2337 Mr Avo Sevag Garabet, Associate Information Officer: +31 (0)70 302 2394 Email: info@icj-cij.org

> > > FEBRUARY 8, 2024 (Columbus, Nebraska) — The Nebraska State Patrol is able to provide additional details on the Columbus Police Department officer-involved shooting that occurred Tuesday afternoon. > > > > At approximately 1:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 6, Columbus police officers were conducting a welfare check following a report of potential self-harm at a residence in the 3600 block of 39th Avenue in Columbus. Officers contacted the subject, a 17-year-old male, inside the residence. The subject was in possession of a knife. > > > > During the encounter, a Columbus police officer discharged their duty weapon, striking the subject. Another officer deployed a taser during the incident. The subject succumbed to injuries and was pronounced deceased at the scene. > > > > The subject has been identified as Chase Ditter, 17, of Columbus. > > > > The Columbus Police Department has requested the Nebraska State Patrol to investigate the incident. The NSP Special Investigations Team is conducting the in-custody death investigation. > > > > The Columbus Police Department has placed both officers involved in the incident on administrative leave. The NSP investigation remains ongoing. > >

Excerpt: > > > b. Defend the Atlanta Forest > > > > Defend the Atlanta Forest is a self-identified coalition and enterprise of militant anarchists, eco-activists, and community organizers. Based in Atlanta, this anarchist, anti-police, and environmental activism organization coordinates, advertises, and conducts "direct action" designed to prevent the construction of the Atlanta Police Public Safety Training Center and Shadowbox Studios (previously known as Blackhall Studios) and promote anarchist ideas. This self-proclaimed "direct action" has included vandalizing of private property, arson, destruction of government property, attacks on utility workers, attacks on law enforcement, attacks on private citizens, and gun violence. The purpose of these actions is to prevent the construction of the Atlanta Police Public Safety Training Center and a movie studio, all while promoting virulent anarchist ideals. > >

> > > NOTA DE PRENSA > IMPEDIR Y DETENER EL GENOCIDIO EN PALESTINA > > > > El Gobierno de Reconciliación y Unidad Nacional informa al Pueblo de Nicaragua y a la Comunidad Internacional que ha notificado a los gobiernos del Reino Unido, Alemania, Países Bajos y Canadá su decisión de responsabilizarlos conforme al Derecho Internacional por violaciones flagrantes y sistemáticas a la Convención para la Prevención y la Sanción del Delito de Genocidio, el Derecho Internacional Humanitario y el Derecho Consuetudinario, incluido el Derecho sobre la ocupación en los Territorios Palestinos Ocupados, en particular la Franja de Gaza. > > > > En este sentido, en una nota verbal enviada a estos Gobiernos, Nicaragua recordó que los hechos y circunstancias de las acciones israelíes en y contra los palestinos llevaron a la Corte Internacional de Justicia a concluir el 26 de Enero de 2024 “que al menos algunos de los Derechos reclamados por Sudáfrica y para las cuales busca protección son plausibles. Este es el caso con respecto al derecho de los palestinos en Gaza a ser protegidos contra actos de genocidio y actos prohibidos relacionados identificados en el artículo III”. > > > > Aunque la Orden sobre Medidas Provisionales de la Corte no es una sentencia sobre el fondo, sin embargo, basándose en las pruebas disponibles públicamente, la Corte consideró plausible que la Convención sobre Genocidio haya sido y esté siendo violada por Israel. Si a juicio del Tribunal Supremo del mundo es plausible que se esté produciendo un genocidio en la Franja de Gaza, no puede ser de otra manera a juicio de la comunidad internacional, que también es dramáticamente consciente de los mismos hechos que llevaron al Tribunal a esa conclusión. > > > > La obligación de prevenir el genocidio surge y comienza cuando existe riesgo de que ocurra; de hecho, cuando es plausible que esté ocurriendo o pueda ocurrir. Esta probabilidad está ahora más allá de toda duda y controversia. > > > > En ese sentido, Nicaragua ha instado a los Gobiernos del Reino Unido, Alemania, Países Bajos y Canadá a detener de inmediato el suministro de armas, municiones, tecnología y/o componentes a Israel, ya que es plausible que hayan sido utilizados para facilitar o cometer violaciones de la Convención sobre Genocidio, incluidos, entre otros, actos de genocidio, intento de genocidio, complicidad en genocidio y conspiración para cometer genocidio. > > > > Lamentablemente, el suministro de armas militares y otro tipo de asistencia que pueda utilizarse en el genocidio que está teniendo lugar no se ha detenido ni disminuido desde que comenzaron los ataques genocidas de Israel contra la Franja de Gaza en octubre de 2023, y en algunos casos, de hecho, ha aumentado. Nicaragua ha recordado a estos gobiernos que “la obligación de un Estado de prevenir, y el correspondiente deber de actuar, surgen en el instante en que el Estado tiene conocimiento, o normalmente debería haber tenido conocimiento, de la existencia de un riesgo grave de que se cometa genocidio”. > Además, Nicaragua ha advertido que los recientes anuncios de estos gobiernos sobre la suspensión de los fondos a la Agencia de Obras Públicas y Socorro de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados de Palestina en el Cercano Oriente (UNRWA por sus siglas en inglés) demuestran aún más que en el escenario actual, los Gobiernos del Reino Unido, Alemania, los Países Bajos y Canadá continúan ignorando sus obligaciones y facilitando activamente las violaciones de las normas del Derecho Internacional por parte de Israel en perjuicio grave e inmediato del Pueblo Palestino, en particular de los habitantes de Gaza, y de la Comunidad Internacional en su conjunto. En especial, Nicaragua ha subrayado que este acto contribuye al castigo colectivo de los palestinos y al aparente objetivo de obligar a la población palestina a abandonar los Territorios Palestinos Ocupados, particularmente Gaza, e impedir el ejercicio de su Derecho a la Autodeterminación. > > > > En consecuencia, Nicaragua ha notificado por escrito a estos gobiernos que adoptará todas las medidas que considere apropiadas de conformidad con el Derecho Internacional, incluido el recurso a la Corte Internacional de Justicia, para garantizar el respeto de estos textos internacionales fundamentales y del Derecho Internacional Consuetudinario. > > > > El Gobierno de Reconciliación y Unidad Nacional reafirma su firme compromiso con el Estado de Derecho a Nivel Internacional y la solución pacífica de controversias entre Estados. > Managua, 1° de Febrero de 2024 > Gobierno de Reconciliación y Unidad Nacional > República de Nicaragua > > Archive link: [https://archive.is/20240208052522/https://www.midef.gob.ni/2024/02/gobierno-de-nicaragua-impedir-y-detener-el-genocidio-en-palestina/](https://archive.is/20240208052522/https://www.midef.gob.ni/2024/02/gobierno-de-nicaragua-impedir-y-detener-el-genocidio-en-palestina/) Versión en inglés: [https://radionicaragua.com.ni/nacionales/gobierno-de-nicaragua-impedir-y-detener-el-genocidio-en-palestina/](https://radionicaragua.com.ni/nacionales/gobierno-de-nicaragua-impedir-y-detener-el-genocidio-en-palestina/) > > > PRESS RELEASE > PREVENT AND STOP THE GENOCIDE IN PALESTINE > > > > The Government of Reconciliation and National Unity informs the people of Nicaragua and the international community that it has notified the governments of the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and Canada of its decision to hold them responsible under international law for gross and systematic violations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, international humanitarian law and customary law, including the law of occupation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, in particular the Gaza Strip. > > > > In this vein, in a note verbal sent to these governments, Nicaragua recalled that the facts and circumstances of the Israeli actions in and against the Palestinians led the International Court of Justice to conclude on 26 January 2024 “that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible. This is the case with respect to the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide and related prohibited acts identified in Article III”. > > > > Although the Order on Provisional Measures of the Court is not a judgment on the merits, nevertheless on the evidence publicly available, the Court found it plausible that the Genocide convention has been and is being violated by Israel. If genocide is plausibly occurring in the Gaza Strip in the judgment of the highest world Court, it cannot be otherwise in the judgment of the international community that is also dramatically aware of the same facts that led the Court to that conclusion. > > > > The obligation to prevent genocide arises and begins when there is a risk of it occurring; in fact, when it is plausible that it is occurring or might occur. This plausibility in now beyond doubt and dispute. > > > > In that sense, Nicaragua has urged the governments of the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and Canada to immediately halt the supply of arms, ammunitions, technology and/or components to Israel as it is plausible they might have been use to facilitate or commit violations of the Genocide Convention, including but not limited to acts of genocide, attempted genocide, complicity in genocide and conspiracy to commit genocide. > > > > Unfortunately, the provision of military weapons and other assistance capable of being used in the genocide taking place has not stopped or diminished since the genocidal attacks of Israel on the Gaza Strip began in October 2023, and in some cases has indeed increased. Nicaragua has reminded these governments that “a State’s obligation to prevent, and the corresponding duty to act, arise at the instant that the State learns of, or should normally have learned of, the existence of a serious risk that genocide will be committed”. > > > > Furthermore, Nicaragua has warned that the recent announcements by these governments on the suspension of the funds to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) further exposes that in the present scenario, the Governments of the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and Canada continue to disregard their obligations, and to actively facilitate violations of the rules of international law by Israel to the severe and immediate prejudice of the Palestinian people, particularly Gazans, and the international community as a whole. In particular, Nicaragua has underscored that this act contributes to the collective punishment of the Palestinians and to the apparent objective of forcing the Palestinian population to leave the Occupied Palestinian Territories, particularly Gaza, and preventing the exercise of their right to self-determination. > > > > Consequently, Nicaragua has given written notice to these governments that it will adopt all measures it considers appropriate in accordance with international law, including recourse to the International Court of Justice, to guarantee respect for these fundamental international texts and customary international law. > > > > The Government of Reconciliation and National Unity reaffirms its firm commitment to the Rule of Law at the International Level and the peaceful settlement of disputes between States. > > > > Managua, 1 February 2024 > Government of Reconciliation and National Unity > Republic of Nicaragua > >

Excerpt: > > > EXECUTIVE SUMMARY > > > > We conclude that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter. We would reach the same conclusion even if Department of Justice policy did not foreclose criminal charges against a sitting president. > > > > Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen. These materials included (1) marked classified documents about military and foreign policy in Afghanistan, and (2) notebooks containing Mr. Biden's handwritten entries about issues of national security and foreign policy implicating sensitive intelligence sources and methods. FBI agents recovered these materials from the garage, offices, and basement den in Mr. Biden's Wilmington, Delaware home. > > > > However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecution of Mr. Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating and mitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice's Principles of Federal Prosecution. For these reasons, we decline prosecution of Mr. Biden. > > > --- > > > The classified documents and other materials recovered in this case spanned Mr. Biden's career in national public life. During that career, Mr. Biden has long seen himself as a historic figure. Elected to the Senate at age twenty-nine, he considered running for president as early as 1980 and did so in 1988, 2008, and 2020. He believed his record during decades in the Senate made him worthy of the presidency, and he collected papers and artifacts related to significant issues and events in his career. He used these materials to write memoirs published in 2007 and 2017, to document his legacy, and to cite as evidence that he was a man of presidential timber. > > > > In 2009, then-Vice President Biden strongly opposed the military's plans to send more troops to Afghanistan. U.S. policy in Afghanistan was deeply important to Mr. Biden, and he labored to dissuade President Obama from escalating America's involvement there and repeating what Mr. Biden believed was a mistake akin to Vietnam. Despite Mr. Biden's advice, President Obama ordered a surge of additional U.S. troops, and Mr. Biden's views endured sharp criticism from others within and outside of the administration. But he always believed history would prove him right. He retained materials documenting his opposition to the troop surge, including a classified handwritten memo he sent President Obama over the 2009 Thanksgiving holiday, and related marked classified documents. FBI agents recovered these materials from Mr. Biden's Delaware garage and home office in December 2022 and January 2023. > > > > Also, during his eight years as vice president, Mr. Biden regularly wrote notes by hand in notebooks. Some of these notes related to classified subjects, including the President's Daily Brief and National Security Council meetings, and some of the notes are themselves classified. After the vice presidency, Mr. Biden kept these classified notebooks in unsecured and unauthorized spaces at his Virginia and Delaware homes and used some of the notebooks as reference material for his second memoir, Promise Me, Dad, which was published in 2017. To our knowledge, no one has identified any classified information published in Promise Me, Dad, but Mr. Biden shared information, including some classified information, from those notebooks with his ghostwriter. FBI agents recovered the notebooks from the office and basement den in Mr. Biden's Delaware home in January 2023. > >

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Trump v. Anderson, a case concerning former President Trump’s appeal of a Colorado Supreme Court’s decision ruling him ineligible to be on the state’s presidential election ballot – LIVE at 10am ET [2/8/2024] on C-SPAN

Excerpt: > > > Since then [certification of Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 presaidential election], hundreds of people who breached the Capitol on January 6, 2021, have been prosecuted and imprisoned. And on August 1, 2023, in Washington, D.C., former President Trump was charged in a four-count Indictment as a result of his actions challenging the election results and interfering with the sequence set forth in the Constitution for the transfer of power from one President to the next. Former President Trump moved to dismiss the Indictment and the district court denied his motion. Today, we affirm the denial. For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant. But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution. > >

Michael Roman, a codefendant of Donald Trump in the Georgia election RICO case, files an instant Motion alleging an improper relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Georgia special prosecutor on the same case, Nathan Wade.

Audio of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals oral argument hearing related to the question of Donald Trump's presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, via CSPAN.

Excerpt: > > > Drawing from actual receipts and records and using the most conservative possible accounting methodologies, *White House for Sale: How Princes, Prime Ministers, and Premiers Paid Off President Trump* documents how, as President, Donald Trump accepted more than $7.8 million in payments from foreign states and their leaders, including some of the world’s most unsavory regimes. By elevating his personal financial interests and the policy priorities of corrupt foreign powers over the American public interest, former President Trump violated both the clear commands of the Constitution and the careful precedent set and observed by every previous Commander-in-Chief. > >

Excerpt: > > > Petitioners-Objectors ... hereby file this Objectors' Petition pursuant to Article 10 of the Election Code and 10 ILCS 5/10-8 challenging the legal and factual sufficiency of the nomination papers of Respondent-Candidate Donald J. Trump ... as a candidate for the Republican Nomination for the Office of President of the United States. > >

Excerpt: > > > For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that Mr. Trump's primary petition is invalid. Specifically, I find that the declaration on his candidate consent form is false because he is not qualified to hold the office of the President under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment. > >

Excerpt: > > > CONCLUSION > > > > The Court should exclude the evidence and argument described above that have no bearing on the defendant’s guilt or innocence, are otherwise irrelevant, or are substantially more prejudicial than probative. > >

Original in Russian, excerpt in English: > > > They brought me in on Saturday evening [12/23/2023]. And they were transported with such precautions and along such a strange route (Vladimir - Moscow - Chelyabinsk - Yekaterinburg - Kirov - Vorkuta - Kharp) that I did not expect that anyone would find me here until mid-January. > >

Excerpt: > > > Here, several considerations make clear the risk that Giuliani may attempt to “conceal and dissipate [his] assets” during the thirty-day period provided by Rule 62(a), wwwfisherpriceonline, 2022 WL 2801022, at \*15, justifying this Court’s exercise of discretion to order immediate dissolution of the automatic stay. > >

Excerpt: > > > A majority of the court holds that President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of Presaident under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Colorado Secretary of State to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot. The court stays its ruling until January 4, 2024, subject to any further appellate proceedings. > >

This Decision and Order from Justice Engoron denies all motions for directed verdict from Donald J. Trump, et al, in the New York State civil liability trial before Justice Engoron. Excerpt: > > > At least five times during the recently concluded ten-and-a-half week trial of this matter, defendants moved for a directed verdict. ... This Court hereby denies that motion and, furthermore, denies all the prior motions that the Court previously took under advisement. > >

Excerpt: > > > On December 4, 2023, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Defendant’s motions to dismiss based on Presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. ECF Nos. 171, 172. Defendant has appealed that decision, ECF No. 177, and filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal, ECF No. 178 (“Motion”). For the reasons set forth below, the court will GRANT in part and DENY in part Defendant’s Motion. > >

This filing by the Government in the DC Circuit case United States of America v. Donald J. Trump describes three expert witnesses that they plan to call to present Donald Trump's cell phone data around January 6, 2021.

Excerpt: > > > **Question presented** > > > > Whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or is constitutionally protected from federal prosecution when he has been impeached but not convicted before the criminal proceedings begin. > >

This document is the ruling from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals regarding Donald J. Trump's motion to lift the gag order put in place by Judge Chutkan. Excerpt: > > > Specifically, the Order is affirmed to the extent it prohibits all parties and their counsel from making or directing others to make public statements about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses concerning their potential participation in the investigation or in this criminal proceeding. The Order is also affirmed to the extent it prohibits all parties and their counsel from making or directing others to make public statements about—(1) counsel in the case other than the Special Counsel, (2) members of the court’s staff and counsel’s staffs, or (3) the family members of any counsel or staff member—if those statements are made with the intent to materially interfere with, or to cause others to materially interfere with, counsel’s or staff’s work in this criminal case, or with the knowledge that such interference is highly likely to result. We vacate the Order to the extent it covers speech beyond those specified categories. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106. The administrative stay issued by this court on November 3, 2023, is hereby dissolved. > >

This document describes proposed rail corridor projects, along with funding amount. Map of the corridors is on p18.

Excerpt: > > > President Donald J. Trump respectfully submits this motion for an order enforcing the automatic stay of all district court proceedings in this case pending the final resolution of his recently filed appeal from the Court’s December 1, 2023 rulings on, inter alia, Presidential immunity and double jeopardy. Docs. 171, 172. The filing of President Trump’s notice of appeal has deprived this Court of jurisdiction over this case in its entirety pending resolution of the appeal. Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 599 U.S. 736, 738 (2023). Therefore, a stay of all further proceedings is mandatory and automatic. Id. > >