ezchili 6mo ago • 33%
The arrest warrant and the 2 additional children were not in the original article
Honestly if there's an arrest warrant and the dude fled it gets harder to defend a burden of proof that's hanging on a system that he manages to evade, though we've seen people genuinely just going back home and getting a warrant after but let's put that aside.
On one hand i appreciate the deterrent that publishing his name is to other sex tourists, but on the other if he gets beaten to death because of it, or worse, some guy with the same name - I'm not fond of that either.
All that while honestly there's already systems in place for fleeting criminals, not sure there's much benefits feeding his real name to the mob in a very well referenced newspaper.
ezchili 6mo ago • 40%
There's confusion. I've maintained that to me, the goalpost is conviction. I cited an article that's less damning for sure but I still motivate my goalpost by principles, not examples. It's simpler to rely on an already established baseline, which is the justice system's convictions, and I'm okay if that means that sometimes, a very plausibly guilty man benefits from undeserved anonimity
But you know, every time I say that homeowners should indeed face jailtime for shooting a fleeting burglar in the back I face the same people with the same arguments
People like to be tough on crime, but I don't like people who feel the need to do justice themselves
ezchili 6mo ago • 33%
He was always probably a pedophile, we've read the same article
You still can't let mobs do the justice
ezchili 6mo ago • 28%
Ill let you simmer that burden of proof comment real quick
ezchili 6mo ago • 71%
I've never used archlinux
People who use arch don't come here they roll their own instance
Iusearch.fyi is speedy and blocks no other instance except the pedo ones so it's the best if you want a self-defined experience on the fediverse without rolling your own lemmy docker
ezchili 6mo ago • 12%
Or perhaps he was framed? Or extorted by the guy who reported it? Or, he's just a pedophile. Probably the latter
That's why we rely on courts and allow people to defend their side of a story
ezchili 6mo ago • 100%
It ""worked"" in France
It still kills most of the userbase when they do it
Normal people don't know what a fucking dns is
You end up with 10 more new sites and a drop in quality and an endless game of cat & mouse
ezchili 6mo ago • 33%
ezchili 6mo ago • 45%
Not comparable
It's a matter of principle, pick any of hundreds of examples if you want a comparison
Again, not comparable
Some people
ezchili 6mo ago • 66%
I never said "no matter what he did"
If convicted I don't care
ezchili 7mo ago • 65%
I just picked the first one when you google "media ruined life"
It's a matter of principle
There's hundreds of examples, pick your favorite
ezchili 7mo ago • 65%
My hopes are low, let's put it like that
But they were also pretty low for Robert Murat, so, I don't like media vigilantism anymore.
ezchili 7mo ago • 69%
ezchili 7mo ago • 80%
No I strongly disagree on giving psychoanalysis that much consideration
Besides the fact that psychoanalysis, new wave or not ; jung, freud, lacan, has only been demonstrated to work better than leaving the patient alone on a handful of illnesses and it's still unclear whether simply letting patients talk and air out their problems could be the main driver of that.
It is fundamentally a discipline that is impermeable to science
I've never heard a student tell me they've read Watson or Rayner or any of the founders of CBT because scientific disciplines are centered around historical results and not authors. They know about Rayner's results and it is enough, and if something better comes along later they'll switch. No one is a Raynerist.
Psychoanalysis has gurus, and the beliefs themselves are built to be unverifiable
I'm tired of lecturers who tell you that if you treat someone with it, it's proof that it works. And if the patient doesn't respond to treatment it's either the patient's fault or they just need more time, and nothing is ever proof that it doesn't work. And who are you to question <authority figure> anyway?
If they suddenly start publishing reproduced results in reputable journals that do anything other than being less effective than the current state of the art, then sure, let's have them beyond history classes. Right now though? It's a load of bullshit
ezchili 7mo ago • 100%
I've had neighbors for 28 years and they've never been a significant portion of my problems. Largely nice, mostly indifferent, sometimes annoying
Being close to things, short commutes, no driving and not being lonely though?
Remove any of those and I'm instantly worse off
ezchili 7mo ago • 87%
Not fun fact: 8 out of 10 shrinks in France use psychoanalysis
Only 1 university in the country excludes it from their care curriculum (history modules non-withstanding)
Only country in the world that hasn't booted that practice off along with argentina
ezchili 7mo ago • 57%
This is a Patrick Symmes's article I read a while ago
https://www.patricksymmes.com/articles/publications/harpers/2010/thirty-days-as-a-cuban/
The data you listed comes from IHME, Global Burden of Disease but there's nothing findable online as to how it's actually gathered
I suspect they got it from the Cuban government
It's not easy having a good nutrition in Cuba
ezchili 7mo ago • 31%
The malnutrition stat is completely made up
The instance seems to work on PC after a relog but it's completely broken on my mobile client. Probably because it keeps a token and refuses to ditch it or something Were there changes in the login mechanism?