You deserve it for typing like that

Average Frenchman circa 300-1912

Vote third in states where a percentage point plus or minus will not change the outcome of the race, like in California or Alabama. For a third party, every vote counts significantly more than to the Republicans or Democrats.

Vote third party if you live in a solid state like me, vote red or blue if you are worried about your states outcome.

You can always vote more left, and should vote more left if you live in a dem stronghold like California.

In a most likely scenario, this ends up being a quick decapitation strike at those attempting to hold the Republic together, or ends up being a low engagement years long drawn out war. The military would be reluctant on both sides, leading to mostly an arms race of local and state police battling disgruntled / rioting citizens with some groups of more organized cells. The Troubles and not GWOT.

This group has guns of their own, they don’t want to risk someone getting hurt, and would rather target the unarmed minorities instead.

Iraq and Afghanistan and Vietnam have left the chat. Why is this talking point always used to counter gun rights? It’s objectively not true ans has been proven time and time again. It’s guerilla / asymmetrical warfare, thr gov has to come to you.

The AKs available to the US consumer are also not weapons of war, they are strictly semi automatic.

An M240 would be a major upgrade in such a scenario. It would be more effective than a pistol, ideally you would have people with M240s and people making IEDs.

OMG! The former president is threatening mass violence and possible oppression by using the US Military on the citizens! Oh btw you shouldn’t have a weapon that looks like the one the military uses or shoots faster than those made 100 years ago.

The AR-15 is not a military weapon, purely civilian. In any case you should be able to own military firearms, the government is not to be trusted.

I don’t get the downvotes, I’m in a similar position and I’m sure so mang others are as well.

.io could be repurposed from “Indian Ocean” to a different acronym like “International Organization.”

Canada only exists today because it is America’s hat and the founding fathers drew a line way farther south than the British originally thought they would. You can actually find the map used by the British which showed just how much territory they were willing to give to America after the revolutionary war, it’s wild to think about.

lol

Money has a definition. It is exchanged for goods and services. In the Star Trek universe, they are not trading replicators in exchange for goods and services, the goods are made by the replicator and services are provided freely. Therefore replicators are not money or income or anything.

But is not income

If it is all publicly available, it should be legal to repackage and release the info. As long as there is no call to action.

I can’t wait for the suprise faces of all the people when they realize the cop is lying to them.

Australia is a failed police state

That is actually the current argument being made for weed legalization. “This isn’t a federal issue, California has every right to make the consumption of canabis legal in their state!” Harris’ legalization would make it legal in states that do not have a set restriction, as well as allow federal employees, such as soldiers, to consume it in legal states.

I never understood doxxing laws. All the people do is compile publicly available data. How is it illegal in some places?